Finalist for Best in PHotography 2011

Look for the upcoming book, "Best in Photography 2011", published by Serbin Communications (Photographers forum). I just received this letter from them in the mail (yesterday)

Samantha Isom, we are please to inform you that you entry is in the Finalist group. As such it will be published in the hardcover book, BEST OF PHOTOGRAPHY 2011..

Mark Seliger never ceases to inspire me! Image shot for Harper's of Winona Ryder and Marc Jacobs

http://img284.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=74885_winona_ryder_baz_mar11_1_m_jacobs_122_95lo.jpg

Kinetic Sculpture photos... Philadelphia, PA

The Kensington Kinetic Sculpture Derby (Portraits), Philadelphia. PA

As part of the Trenton AVe Arts Festival started a few years ago in North Philadelphia, hundred of artists (professional and hobbyists) gather together in themed teams to strut their stuff. http://www.kinetickensington.org/

Leica's slide show tonight at 55 Washington st

Come to 55 Washington St tonight, one of my images is featured in their slide show from 5-7pm....as part of the Leica scavenger hunt in the NY Photo festival

Scientists cure cancer, but no one takes notice

This is off topic from the Photography biz, BUT....after being with my mother through Cancer treatments for the last few months.....I've realized it def would have been nice to know about this (see article).

Scientists cure cancer, but no one takes notice

portfolio reviews, are they worth it?

$1,699 for a portfolio review? Are they serious? Someone in the biz, please view this short video and help me to understand if this portfolio review is worth paying two month's rent. If so, I guess it's time to start writing that check..but if not, please stop me before the ink dries. http://vimeo.com/15505774

I was told by one friend years ago about 'the game'. I've never been much for games so it's always been difficult to understand formulas and such when it comes to anything let alone in the Photo 'biz'/world. A friend (art major at an 'accredited school'), commented on how art can be judged on how it relates back to what art came before it. Who cares what came before...isn't it about what you feel now? It's not natural for me to think about what people want to see or how they want it explained and what not. Isn't art supposed to be expressive from the artist? If it is the artists intent to pay homage to a previous artist or previous piece, then great, that artists should mention that in case people don't know what he/she is referring to. Kind of like a someone referencing an old tv show to an audience who has never watched tv or too young to have seen the show they are referencing. The last thing crossing my mind is how one project relates to another..because that shouldn't matter. Each project should stand on it's own for what it is totally unrelated to what other projects came before or projects to come after. Art shouldn't be about how it reminds you of other art, unless that IS the art. Ex: some of the sculptures in the Trenton NJ sculpture garden (Grounds for sculpture) are exact replicas of art from centuries long gone. Famous pieces that were originally 2 dimensional paintings are now totally recreated as 3 dimensional sculptures in a forest. Nice. But that IS the point in this art, though not original at all except in it's execution...it's still art. But, if someone wants to paint something 2 dimensional but not related to any previous style except by only coincidence and not purposefully done in the style of or directly influenced by etc. That too, is art. so what if it 'has been seen before' or hasn't. Art is what you feel, not what you go to school for. Art doesn't need to be studied in order to be felt. And the art that does need to be studied in order to be understood......... is THAT really art?